When a trench is not an option, send it through the air.
A shop across the yard. A second building on the property. A site where there is no path to put fibre in the ground and no appetite to dig one. A point to point link carries the network across the gap.
A pair, one at each end.
They need to see each other. Line of sight is the requirement, and it is the one thing that cannot be worked around.
Device Bridge Pro
A pair of these carries the network between two points that can see each other.
Prices are all-in CAD, Ubiquiti’s own price including their memory surcharge, and we add nothing to them. They move when Ubiquiti moves them, so we confirm every line on the quote.
Being straight about when this is the right answer.
- Line of sight is not negotiable. Trees grow and buildings go up. We check the path before anything is quoted.
- Fibre is better where a path exists. If a route can be put in the ground, put it in the ground. Glass does not care about weather, and it will outlast the radios.
- Weather is a real factor here. Snow load and ice on a mount are Calgary problems, so the mounting matters as much as the radio.
- It is one link, not coverage. A bridge carries the network to the far building. Access points still do the Wi-Fi once it arrives.
If you can dig, dig
We would rather sell you the right answer. Where a path for fibre exists, see fibre builds. A wireless link is what you use when that is genuinely not possible.
Send us the two addresses.
Distance and what sits between them decides whether this works. That check is quick and it is free.
Want the full detail? Bridging and Connectivity in the wiki has the complete tables and the specs behind these choices.